Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume 11, Issue 5 , Pages 713-722, October 1976

Esophageal atresia treated by electromagnetic bougienage and subsequent repair

  • W. Hardy Hendren

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprint requests: W. Hardy Hendren, M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass. 02114.
    • Division of Pediatric Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA
    • Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., USA
  • ,
  • J. Richard Hale

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pediatric Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA
    • Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., USA

Abstract 

There are some infants with esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula in whom the esophageal segments are too far apart to allow safe primary anastomosis without tension. During the past 20 yr the most widely used approach in these cases has been temporary marsupialization of the blindly ending upper esophagus to the neck, followed later by interposition of a segment of colon.1 Howard and Myers2 introduced manual bougienage for the upper pouch to elongate it and accomplish a delayed primary anastomosis. This technique was later used with some success in other institutions.3 Rehbein4 placed bougies in both esophageal segments and applied traction sutures threaded through the ends of the pouches that were pulled together slowly.

This paper describes another method used in four infants with esophageal atresia. Metal bougies (“bullets”) were placed into the two ends of the esophagus. An electromagnetic field was then used to pull the bullets together to elongate the esophageal ends in order to allow esophageal anastomosis, which had been impossible previously. Cases 1 and 2 were discussed in a previous report5 and therefore will not be described in as much detail as Cases 3 and 4. Certain refinements in the method were developed in treating Cases 3 and 4. For example: (1) The sump suction tube attached to the upper-pouch bullet was brought out through a lateral pharyngotomy instead of the nose. (2) The stem of the lower-pouch bullet was brought through a small separate stab incision in the midline to direct it straight upward. Leakage around the gastrostomy site proved troublesome when it was brought through the same opening as the gastrostomy tube. (3) The lower-pouch bullet was placed “by feel” into the distal esophagus, not requiring anesthesia. Initially this was done under direct endoscopic visualization using anesthesia. (4) Placing of the lower-pouch bullet, which has a flexible steel stem, was accomplished by sliding a rigid metal tube over the flexible cable, using this as a handle to direct the bullet into the distal esophagus.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented before the 7th Annual Meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association, Boca Raton, Fla., April 29–May 1, 1976.Supported in part by a contract (NSF-C670 TASK 4) with the National Science Foundation, RANN Program.

PII: 0022-3468(76)90095-6

Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume 11, Issue 5 , Pages 713-722, October 1976