Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 312-315, February 2001

Patterns of management of intussusception outside tertiary centres☆☆

Presented at the 47th Annual International Congress of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, Sorrento, Italy, July 18-21, 2000.

Departments of Paediatric Surgery and Paediatrics, University Hospital Lewisham, Lewisham, London, England

Abstract 

Background/Purpose: Intussusception is a common problem in young children and should have an excellent outcome in expert hands. Many children are treated in district general hospitals (DGH), which do not have specialist paediatric surgeons. The aim of this study was to clarify current patterns of management for such patients. Methods: The authors conducted a postal survey of DGH consultant paediatricians, radiologists, and general surgeons in a populous region of England. Results: One hundred forty-one (44%) consultants who responded comprised similar proportions of consultants from each specialty. Most respondents (79%) thought that in their location paediatricians should take responsibility for resuscitation of children with suspected intussusception. Two-thirds indicated that abdominal ultrasound scan, either alone or in combination with another modality, was their investigation of choice for confirming the diagnosis. Preferences for contrast medium for radiologic reduction varied; paediatricians favoured air (46%) or saline (28%), surgeons preferred water-soluble contrast (58%), and radiologists preferred to use barium (49%). Fifty-three percent of consultants indicated they would transfer a child with confirmed intussusception to a tertiary centre before attempting reduction, 42% would attempt reduction locally, and 5% would operate locally without attempting radiologic reduction. After failed reduction, a further 23% of consultants would consider transfer, but the remainder would operate locally. Only 13% of paediatricians thought that their surgeons had appropriate facilities and support to operate on intussusception, but 36% of surgeons claimed to be doing so. Most consultants (84%) admitted seeing fewer than 5 cases per year; 98% of surgeons were in this group. Only 16% of consultants (mostly paediatricians) were aware of any written clinical policy for managing paediatric intussusception in their hospital. Conclusion: This study shows that the management of paediatric intussusception outside tertiary centres is not uniform or standardised, and that improvements are necessary. J Pediatr Surg 36:312-315. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Keywords:  Intussusception, diagnosis, management, surgery, standards

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by NHS R&D Support Funding within Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust.

☆☆ Address reprint requests to Miss Evelyn Dykes, FRCS(Paeds), Senior Lecturer in Paediatric Surgery, Kings College London, Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, London SE13 6LH, England.

PII: S0022-3468(01)21866-1

doi:10.1053/jpsu.2001.20704

Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 312-315, February 2001