| | Preoperative enterocolitis is associated with poorer long-term bowel function after Soave-Boley endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease☆Presented at the 49th Annual Congress of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, Cambridge, England, July 23-26, 2002. Abstract Background/Purpose: The purpose of the investigation was to apply a semiquantitative scoring system for bowel function to patients who had undergone endorectal pull-through (ERPT) for Hirschsprung's disease (HD) and to use this to analyse the clinical factors relating to functional outcome. Methods: The case note details of 63 patients undergoing ERPT for HD were reviewed. A questionnaire using a semiquantitative scoring system for 6 aspects of bowel function was sent to parents of 55 patients. The total functional score (TFS) for each patient was calculated, and a statistical analysis was performed to determine which clinical factors were significantly related to bowel functional outcome. Results: Fifty (91%) of the parents returned the questionnaire. TFS was “good” in 45%, “fair” in 33% and “poor” in 22%. There was a statistically significant difference in the scores of those who had preoperative Hirschsprung's associated enterocolitis (HAEC) TFS = 8.0 and those who did not, TFS 12.7 (P < .01) The sex of the patient, length of aganglionic segment, timing of ERPT (early/late), staging of ERPT (1 or 2), presence/absence of anastomotic stricture, and presence or absence of Down's syndrome did not statistically significantly affect TFS. Conclusions: Preoperative HAEC was the most important factor in relation to functional outcome after ERPT for HD. The reason remains unclear. J Pediatr Surg 38:69-72. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
Since Swenson described his definitive operation for the treatment of Hirschsprung's disease (HD) in 1948,1 our understanding of this condition has increased greatly. Although most reports suggest an improved long-term outcome,2 some studies show that children with HD continue to suffer considerable morbidity.3, 4, 5 Incomplete understanding of the aetiology and prevention6 of Hirschsprung's-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) is a significant contributing factor to morbidity and mortality of children with HD.6, 7, 8
This study evaluates the long-term outcome of bowel function in children with HD treated by Soave-Boley endorectal pull-through (ERPT) procedure.9
Materials and methods  Between 1983 and 1998, 63 children (56 boys and 7 girls) underwent Soave-Boley ERPT for HD. At the time of review in 2001, all children were at least 3 years of age, which allowed meaningful assessment of bowel function. The study consisted of (1) a review of case notes and (2) a detailed questionnaire on aspects of the child's bowel function completed by parents. The case note review obtained information regarding presentation, age at diagnosis, associated conditions and family history of HD, extent of aganglionosis, age at ERPT, primary or 2-stage ERPT, early and delayed postoperative complications, and length of follow-up. The questionnaire used a semiquantitative scoring system for 6 aspects of bowel function at the time of the study (Table 1).
 | Ability to hold back defecation | |  |
 | Always | 3 |  |
 | Weekly problems | 2 |  |
 | Problems < 1/week | 1 |  |
 | No voluntary controls | 0 |  |
 | Feels/reports urge to defecate | |  |
 | Always | 3 |  |
 | Most of the time | 2 |  |
 | Uncertain | 1 |  |
 | Absent | 0 |  |
 | Frequency of defecation | |  |
 | Every other day to twice a day | 3 |  |
 | More often | 2 |  |
 | Less often | 1 |  |
 | Soiling | |  |
 | Never | 3 |  |
 | Staining < 1/week, no underwear change required | 2 |  |
 | Frequent staining, underwear often changed | 1 |  |
 | Daily soiling, protective aids | 0 |  |
 | Accidents | |  |
 | Never | 3 |  |
 | Fewer than 1/week | 2 |  |
 | Weekly accidents, often requires protective aids | 1 |  |
 | Daily, requires protective aids during day & night | 0 |  |
 | Social problems | |  |
 | No social problems | 3 |  |
 | Sometimes (foul odours) | 2 |  |
 | Problems causing restriction in social life | 1 |  |
 | Severe social and/or psychological problems | 0 |  | | | |
It was similar to the questionnaire used by Rintala and Lindahl 10 in their assessment of bowel function in children after surgery for anorectal malformations. The aspects of bowel function assessed were ability to hold back defecation, feeling or reporting urgency to defecate, frequency of defecation, accidents, soiling, and social problems. A functional score of 0/1 to 3 was given for each component. Total functional score (TFS) of 13 to 18 was classified as “good,” 7 to 12 as “fair” and 1 to 6 as “poor” and was taken as being representative of long-term bowel function. Mann-Whitney tests were used to analyse the TFS between groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS Version 6.12.
Results  The demographic data of the 63 children who underwent Soave-Boley ERPT for HD were the following: 56 boys and 7 girls, mean age at the time of the study was 8.8 years (range, 3.0 to 17.4 years), and mean birth weight was 3,331 g (range, 870 g to 4,330 g). Forty-five (71%) patients presented within 72 hours of birth. Seven (11%) presented with features of enterocolitis (fever, leucocytosis, bleeding per rectum, pneumoperitoneum or intramural gas on plain abdominal radiograph). Mean age at ERPT was 135.5 days, median 50 days (range, 12 to 1,416 days). Primary ERPT was performed in 52 patients (83%), and 2-stage ERPT was done in 11 patients (17%). Early ERPT (at <50 days of age) was performed in 29 patients and late ERPT (>50 days of age) in 34 patients. The extent of the aganglionic segment was rectosigmoid (38, 60%), long segment (21, 33%), and total colonic (4, 6%). There was a family history of HD in 2 cases. Major associated abnormalities were: Down's syndrome (n = 7), cardiac lesions (n = 3), congenital hypoventilation syndrome (n = 1), congenital amputation of forearm (n = 1), and horse-shoe kidney (n = 1). Postoperative complications are shown in Table 2.
 | Early | |  |
 | Anastomotic stricture | 14 |  |
 | Enterocolitis | 6 |  |
 | Wound problems | 7 |  |
 |  Infection | 3 |  |
 |  Dehiscence | 4 |  |
 | Mucosal prolapse | 2 |  |
 | Pelvic sepsis | 2 |  |
 | Colon retraction | 2 |  |
 | Intestinal obstruction | 1 |  |
 | Late | |  |
 | Enterocolitis | 8 |  |
 | Adhesive intestinal obstruction | 3 |  |
 | Incisional hernia | 1 |  |
 | Short bowel syndrome | 1 |  |
 | Cerebral palsy | 1 |  | | | |
Further operative procedures are shown in Table 3.
 | Rectal biopsies for constipation | 8 |  |
 | Wound resutured (dehiscence) | 4 |  |
 | Colostomy for constipation and soiling | 3 |  |
 | Laparotomy for adhesive obstruction | 2 |  |
 | Repeat pullthrough (anastomotic stricture, colon retraction) | 2 |  |
 | Antegrade continent enema (ACE) for constipation | 2 |  |
 | Anal mucosectomy (mucosal prolapse) | 2 |  |
 | Laparotomy and biopsies for constipation | 1 |  | | | |
Three patients died of unrelated causes, and 5 have permanent stomas. Of the 63 patients operated on, 8 were excluded from review (3 deaths, 3 with permanent colostomy, and 2 with antegrade continent enema procedures). Questionnaires were sent to parents of 55 children and 50 (91%) were returned. TFS was “good” in 25 (45%), “fair” in 18 (33%), and “poor” in 12 (22%). Fewer than half of the patients, therefore, had what parents and clinicians would perceive as “normal” bowel function. TFS was analysed with regard to subgroups of patients. Figure 1 shows the mean functional scores comparing boys and girls, early or late ERPT, levels of aganglionic segment, primary or 2-stage ERPT, and presence or absence of anastomotic stricture, Down's syndrome, and preoperative enterocolitis.
There was no significant difference for any of these other than preoperative enterocolitis. Although mean score for patients with Downs syndrome was lower, the difference did not reach statistical significance. Mean TFS was worse for those patients who had preoperative enterocolitis (TFS, 8.0) than for those who did not (TFS, 12.7). This difference was statistically significant (P < .01). There was, however, no significant difference in means for age at presentation, age at diagnosis, length of aganglionic segment, or age at ERPT between the 2 groups.
Discussion  Analysis of long-term anorectal function in children after surgical management of HD or anorectal malformation by pull-through procedure is difficult because of inability to define normal bowel function; lack of precise definitions and objective measurements to assess “constipation” and “faecal continence”; usage of different scoring and grading systems by different investigators; usage of different study methods (eg, questionnaire/clinical examination/psychological profile/manometric studies/colonic transit times) to assess bowel function; grouping together of patients with different surgical procedures (eg, Duhamel, Swenson, ERPT); the influence of varying social, cultural, dietary, and economic conditions on bowel function. The scoring system used in this series was devised to avoid the need for direct patient review or repeat investigation and is a composite of previous methods based principally on that of Rintala and Lindahl.10 However, for HD, some conclusions can be made: (1) children with HD can suffer considerable long-term morbidity,4, 5 (2) HAEC is a major factor in morbidity and mortality,6, 7 (3) bowel function is related to length of aganglionic segment (patients with total colonic aganglionosis [TCA] do less well than those with rectosigmoid disease),2, 5 (4) children with Down's syndrome have a poorer outcome,11 (5) evidence regarding improvement of bowel function with time is conflicting because there is an absence of longitudinal studies and possible underreporting by parents because of adaptation to the difficulties associated with the condition. In our series, absence of a pattern of increasing severity of bowel malfunction with increasing extent of aganglionosis is probably because of the small number of patients with TCA (4 patients; 6.3%). Similarly, although patients with Down's syndrome had a lower mean TFS, the relatively small number precluded statistical analysis. The reasons for poorer outcome in patients with preoperative HAEC are not clear, although a high mortality rate for this group has been reported previously. A survey of 1,196 patients by the Surgical Section of the American Academy of Pediatrics (Kleinhaus et al12) showed an incidence of prediagnosis HAEC of 15% with a 30% mortality rate within this group. Sarioglu et al7 reported a 26% incidence of preoperative HAEC and 7.6% mortality rate. Questions remain as to whether (1) variations in factors between HD patients (eg, properties of gut mucosa6, 13) predispose both to HAEC and to poorer long-term outcome and whether (2) preoperative HAEC compromises outcome from ERPT surgery. In clinical practice, suspicion of HAEC (signs of abdominal distension or tenderness, bleeding per rectum or pneumoperitoneum) should lead to prompt resuscitative and supportive measures in an effort to limit the morbidity and mortality of this potentially fulminant condition.
Acknowledgements  The authors thank Robert Carachi, Carl Davis, Alasdair Fyfe, Graham Haddock, and Professor Dan Young for permission to study their patients and Dr David Young, Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, who kindly analysed the data for this study.
Discussion  A. Pierro (London, England): I really enjoyed your paper and thank you for these interesting results. We know from recent cases that in children with a failed pull-through, we have found an association with esonophilic colitis. Have you looked at these patients? G.V.S. Murthi (response): We have not come across this in our group of patients. References  1.
1
Coran AG, Teitelbaum DH.
Recent advances in the management of Hirschsprung's disease.
Am J Surg. 2000;180:382–387. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (1077 KB)
|
CrossRef
2.
2
Moore SW, Albertyn R, Cywes S.
Clinical outcome and long-term quality of life after surgical correction of Hirschsprung's disease.
J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31:1496–1502. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (780 KB)
|
CrossRef
3.
3
Mishalany HG, Wooley MM.
Post-operative functional and manometric evaluation of patients with Hirschsprung's disease.
J Pediatr Surg. 1987;22:443–446. Abstract |
CrossRef
4.
4
Baillie CT, Kenny SE, Rintala RJ, et al.
Long-term outcome and colonic motility after the Duhamel Procedure for Hischsprung's disease.
J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34:325–329. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (539 KB)
|
CrossRef
5.
5
Heij HA, de Vries X, Bremer I, et al.
Long-term anorectal function after Duhamel operation for Hirschsprung's disease.
J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30:430–432. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (252 KB)
|
CrossRef
6.
6
Teitelbaum DH, Coran AG.
Enterocolitis.
Semin Pediatr Surg. 1998;7:162–169. Abstract 7.
7
Sarioglu A, Tanyel FC, Buyukpamukcu N, et al.
Clinical risk factors of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis. I: Preoperative enterocolitis.
Turk J Pediatr. 1997;39:81–89. MEDLINE 8.
8
Marty TL, Matlak ME, Hendrickson M, et al.
Unexpected death from enterocolitis after surgery for Hirschsprung's diasase.
Pediatrics. 1995;96:118–121. 9.
9
Boley S.
An endorectal pull-through operation with primary anastomosis for Hirschsprung's disease.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968;127:353–357. MEDLINE 10.
10
Rintala RJ, Lindahl H.
Is normal bowel function possible after repair of intermediate and high anorectal malformations?.
J Pediatr Surg. 1995;22:491–494. 11.
11
Quinn FMJ, Surana R, Puri P.
The influence of trisomy 21 on outcome in children with Hirschsprung's disease.
J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:781–783. Abstract |
CrossRef
12.
12
Kleinhaus S, Boley SJ, Sherman M, et al.
Hirschsprung's disease: A survey of the Surgical section of the American Academy for Pediatrics.
J Pediatr Surg. 1979;16:588–597. 13.
13
Aslam A, Spicer RD, Corfield AP.
Turnover of radioactive mucin precursors in the colon of patients with Hirschsprung's disease correlates with the development of enterocolitis.
J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33:103–105. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (319 KB)
|
CrossRef
Glasgow, Scotland From the Department of Surgical Paediatrics, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, Scotland ☆ Address reprint requests to Peter A.M. Raine, Department of Surgical Paediatrics, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill, Glasgow G3 8SJ, Scotland. PII: S0022-3468(02)63021-0 doi:10.1053/jpsu.2003.50013 © 2003 Published by Elsevier Inc. | |
|