Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 5 , Pages 685-689, May 2004

Miniature access pectus excavatum repair: lessons we have learned

Presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada, September 18–21, 2003.

  • Garret S. Zallen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgical Services, The Woman and Children’s Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
    • Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Philip L. Glick

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgical Services, The Woman and Children’s Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
    • Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Philip L. Glick, MD, The Woman and Children’s Hospital of Buffalo, 219 Bryant St, Buffalo, NY 14222 USA

Abstract 

Background

Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common chest well deformity seen in children. In 1997, the Miniature Access Pectus Excavatum repair (MAPER) was presented by Nuss et al, adding a new option for PE repair. This operation entails placing a custom bent metal bar across the chest to mechanically raise the sternum and remodel the cartilage. The authors have added modifications to Nuss’ original description of this operation in an attempt to optimize technique, minimize complications, and improve outcomes.

Methods

The authors have performed 52 MAPERs with an average operating time of 106 minutes, average length of stay of 3.9 days, and return to normal activities of 2 to 6 weeks. Modifications to Nuss’ original description include preoperative evaluation consisting of an echocardiogram and pulmonary function tests (PFTs; with and without exercise and with and without bronchodilators), abandoning the use of routine preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans, the use of unilateral positive pressure insufflation of the hemithorax to provide visualization, and anesthesia using an epidural pain catheter (intraoperative and postoperative for 3 days). Intraoperatively, we use a 70° thoracoscope for optimal visualization, and we have modified their location for optimal visualization. Additionally, the bars are secured with surgical wire, not absorbable suture, to avoid bar slippage.

Results

Postoperatively, we leave our bars in for 3 years and have had no recurrences. Furthermore, these patients require significant support during the time their bars are in place and occasionally require reoperation to fix symptomatic problems with their bar.

Conclusions

Since the first description of the MAPER was presented more than 5 years ago, the operative treatment of PE has changed dramatically. The authors feel that the MAPER is superior to the open technique, and with the modifications they have implemented, complications have been minimized, and long-term results have been improved.

Keywords:  Pectus excavatum, Nuss procedure, minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair, lessons learned

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3468(04)00064-8

doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.01.046

Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 5 , Pages 685-689, May 2004