Research Article| Volume 39, ISSUE 6, P976-978, June 2004

Determination of national pediatric injury prevention priorities using the injury prevention priority score



      Previous studies have found that the Injury Prevention Priority Score (IPPS) provides a reliable and valid method to gauge the relative importance of different injury causal mechanisms at individual trauma centers. This study examines its applicability to prioritizing injury mechanisms on a national level and within defined pediatric age groups.


      A total of 47,158 patients (age <17) in the National Pediatric Trauma Registry were grouped into common injury mechanisms based on ICD-9 E-Codes. Patients also were stratified by age group. IPPS was calculated for each mechanism and within each age group.


      Falls of all types account for the greatest number of injuries (n = 15,042; 32%), whereas child abuse results in the most severe injuries (mean Injury Severity Score, 13.3) However, the most significant mechanisms of injury, according to IPPS, were motor vehicle crashes followed by pedestrian struck by motor vehicles. Certain age groups had specific injury problems including child abuse in infants and assault and gun injuries in adolescents.


      IPPS provides an objective, quantitative method for determining injury prevention priorities based on both frequency and severity at the national level. It also is sensitive to age-related changes in different mechanisms of injury.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Haider A
        • Risucci D
        • Paidas C
        • et al.
        Injury prevention priority score.
        J Am Coll Surgeons. 2004; 198 (in press)
        • Risucci D
        • Haider A
        • Sullivan T
        • et al.
        Validation of an Injury Prevention Priority Score.
        Presented at the sixty second annual meeting of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. 2002 (Orlando, Florida. September 12–14)
        • Tepas J
        • Ramenofsky M
        • Di Scala D
        • et al.
        National Pediatric Trauma Registry.
        J Pediatr Surg. 1989; 24: 156-158
      1. CDC Recommended framework for presenting injury mortality data.
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 1997; 46 (RR-14 29): 1-30
        • Baker S.P
        • O’Neil B
        • Haddon W
        • et al.
        The injury severity score.
        J Trauma. 1974; 14: 187-196
        • Baker S
        • O’Neil B
        The injury severity score.
        J Trauma. 1976; 16: 882-885
        • Champion H.R
        • Sacco W.J
        • Copes W.S
        A revision of the Trauma Score.
        J Trauma. 1997; 29: 624
        • Healey C
        • Osler T.M
        • Rogers F.B
        • et al.
        Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score.
        J Trauma. 2003; 54 (discussion 678–80): 671-678
        • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, C.D.C.
        Research Agenda. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (GA)2002