Incision and loop drainage: a minimally invasive technique for subcutaneous abscess management in children

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes after a minimally invasive approach to pediatric subcutaneous abscess management as a replacement for wide exposure, debridement, and repetitive packing.

      Methods

      A retrospective study was performed of all children who underwent incision and loop drainage for subcutaneous abscesses between January 2002 and October 2007 at our institution.

      Technique

      Two mini incisions, 4-5 mm each, were made on the abscess, as far apart as possible. Abscess was probed, and pus was drained. Abscess was irrigated with normal saline; a loop drain was passed through one incision, brought out through the other, and tied to itself. An absorbent dressing was applied over the loop and changed regularly.

      Results

      One hundred fifteen patients underwent drainage procedures as described; 5 patients had multiple abscesses. Mean values (range) are as follows: age, 4.25 years (19 days to 20.5 years); duration of symptoms, 7.8 days (1-42 days); length of hospital stay, 3 days (1-39 days); duration of procedure, 10.8 minutes (4-43 minutes); drain duration, 10.4 days (3-24 days); and number of postoperative visits, 1.8 (1-17). Bacterial culture data were available for 101 patients. Of these, 50% had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 26% had methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and 9% streptococcal species. Of the 115 patients, 5 had pilonidal abscesses, 1 required reoperation for persistent drainage, and 1 had a planned staged excision. Of the remaining 110 patients, 6 (5.5%) required reoperation—4 with loop drains and 2 with incision and packing with complete healing.

      Conclusion

      The use of loop drains proved safe and effective in the treatment of subcutaneous abscesses in children. Eliminating the need for repetitive and cumbersome wound packing simplifies postoperative wound care. Furthermore, there is an expected cost savings with this technique given the decreased need for wound care materials and professional postoperative home health services. We recommend this minimally invasive technique as the treatment of choice for subcutaneous abscesses in children and consider it the standard of care in our facility.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Anaya D.A.
        • Dellinger E.P.
        Surgical infections and choice of antibiotics.
        in: Townsend C.M. Beauchamp R.D. Evers B.M. Sabiston textbook of surgery. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia (Pa)2004: 264
        • Eldich R.F.
        • Winters K.L.
        • Britt L.D.
        • et al.
        Bacterial diseases of the skin.
        J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005; 15: 499-510
        • Brook I.
        Microbiology and management of soft tissue and muscle infections.
        Int J Surg. 2008; 6: 328-338
        • Tanir G.
        • Tonbul A.
        • Tuygun N.
        • et al.
        Soft tissue infections in children: a retrospective analysis of 242 hospitalized patients.
        Jpn J Infect Dis. 2006; 59: 258-260
        • Brook I.
        Cutaneous and subcutaneous infections in newborns due to anaerobic bacteria.
        J Perinat Med. 2002; 30: 197-208
        • Hau T.
        • Förster E.
        Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of soft tissue infections.
        Zentralbl Chir. 1990; 115: 521-541
        • Sorensen C.
        • Hjortrup A.
        • Moesgaard F.
        • et al.
        Linear incision and curettage vs. deroofing and drainage in subcutaneous abscess. A randomized clinical trial.
        Acta Chir Scand. 1987; 153: 659-660