Advertisement
Rapid Communication| Volume 48, ISSUE 2, e29-e31, February 2013

Download started.

Ok

A case of absence of extrahepatic portal bifurcation in biliary atresia

      Abstract

      The absence of extrahepatic portal bifurcation is a rare anomaly and is considered to be caused by anomalous development of the portal vessels early in fetal life. The portal system develops from two main fetal vessels, the left umbilical vein and right vitelline vein. An anomalous connection of these two vessels early in fetal life results in the absence of bifurcation of the portal vein. We report a case who suffered from biliary atresia complicated with the absence of bifurcation of the portal vein. The patient had an anomalous left hepatic portal vein that ran along the cranial side of the hepatic hilar ductal plate. This is the first report of biliary atresia that was complicated with the absence of extrahepatic portal bifurcation.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fraser-Hill M.A.
        • Atri M.
        • Bret P.M.
        • et al.
        Intrahepatic portal venous system: variations demonstrated with duplex and color Doppler US.
        Radiology. 1990; 177: 523-526
        • Chaib E.
        Absence of bifurcation of the portal vein.
        Surg Radiol Anat. 2009; 31: 389-392
        • Chaib E.
        • Rieiro Jr., M.A.F.
        • Saad W.A.
        • et al.
        The main hepatic anatomic variations for the purpose of split-liver transplantation.
        Transplantation Proc. 2005; 37: 1063-1066
        • Gallego C.
        • Velasco M.
        • Marcuello P.
        • et al.
        Congenital and acquired anomalies of the portal venous system.
        Radiographics. 2002; 22: 141-159
        • Atri M.
        • Bret P.M.
        • Fraser-Hil M.A.
        Intrahepatic portal venous variations: prevalence with US.
        Radiology. 1992; 184: 157-158
        • Baba Y.
        • Hokotate H.
        • Nishi H.
        • et al.
        Intrahepatic portal venous variations: demonstration by helical CT during arterial portography.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000; 24: 802-808
        • Andrew M.
        • Darius M.
        • de Goyet
        • et al.
        Absence of the left portal vein: a difficulty for reduction of liver graft?.
        Transplantation. 2000; 69: 1731-1732
        • Yamamoto H.
        • Nagino M.
        • Kawabata Y.
        • et al.
        Resection of a hilar cholangiocarcinoma in a patient with absent portal bifurcation.
        Hepatogastroenterol. 2000; 47: 362-364
        • Sato M.
        • Ishida H.
        • Konno K.
        • et al.
        Congenital absence of the horizontal portion of the left portal vein: ultrasound findings.
        Eur Radiol. 2000; 10: 362-364
        • Chevallier P.
        • Oddo F.
        • Baldini E.
        • et al.
        Agenesis of the horizontal segment of the left portal vein demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging including phase-contrast magnetic resonance venography.
        Eur Radiol. 2000; 10: 365-367
        • Cheynel N.
        • Arnal E.
        • Rat P.
        • et al.
        Absence of the portal bifurcation at the hilum of the liver due to intrahepatic origin of the left branch of the portal vein.
        Surg Radiol Anat. 2001; 23: 355-357
        • Lerut J.
        • Ciccarelli O.
        • Danse E.
        • et al.
        Left lobe living related liver transplantation in the absence of an extrahepatic left portal vein.
        Transplantation. 2002; 74: 278-279