Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 48, ISSUE 6, P1249-1253, June 2013

Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric melanoma

  • Paul E. Palmer III
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatric Surgery, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Carla L. Warneke
    Affiliations
    Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Andrea A. Hayes-Jordan
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatric Surgery, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Cancer Hospital at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Cynthia E. Herzog
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Cancer Hospital at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dennis P.M. Hughes
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Cancer Hospital at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kevin P. Lally
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatric Surgery, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Cancer Hospital at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mary T. Austin
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler, Unit 1406, Houston, TX 77030–1439. Tel.: +1 713 794 4408; fax: +1 713 794 5720.
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatric Surgery, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Cancer Hospital at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The purpose of this study was to characterize the complications associated with surgical treatment of pediatric melanoma.

      Methods

      We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric patients who received surgical treatment for melanoma at our institution between 1992 and 2010. We compared complications between three groups: wide local excision only (WLE), WLE and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and WLE and completion lymph node dissection (CLND).

      Results

      One hundred twenty-five patients were identified: 37 patients received WLE only, 47 received WLE and SLNB, and 41 patients had WLE and CLND. Complication rates differed between the three groups: 19% in WLE, 11% in WLE + SLNB, and 39% in WLE + CLND (P = .006). The risk of complications was significantly lower among patients having WLE + SLNB versus WLE + CLND (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06–0.57, P = .0032). Lymphedema was a common complication with a higher incidence in the CLND group compared to the SLNB group (19.5% vs. 2.1%, P = .01). Complications were more frequent in inguinal compared to axillary dissections (52.0% vs. 17.1%, P = .006).

      Conclusions

      In the surgical treatment of pediatric melanoma, the addition of a completion lymph node dissection significantly increases complication risk. Thus, it is critical to determine which patients truly benefit from this procedure.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. CDC: NPCR: United States CA Statistics. 7/14/2012. http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/uscs/toptencancers.aspx.

        • Lange J.R.
        • Palis B.E.
        • Chang D.C.
        • et al.
        Melanoma in children and teenagers: an analysis of patients from the National Cancer data base.
        J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 1363-1368
        • Strouse J.J.
        • Fears T.R.
        • Tucker M.A.
        • et al.
        Pediatric melanoma: risk factor and survival analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database.
        J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 4735-4741
        • Moore-Olufemi S.
        • Herzog C.
        • Warneke C.
        • et al.
        Outcomes in pediatric melanoma-comparing prepubertal to adolescent pediatric patients.
        Ann Surg. 2011; 253: 1211-1215
        • Morton D.L.
        • Wen D.R.
        • Wong J.H.
        • et al.
        Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.
        Arch Surg. 1992; 127: 392-399
        • Neville H.L.
        • Andrassy R.J.
        • Lally K.P.
        • et al.
        Lymphatic mapping with sentinel node biopsy in pediatric patients.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2000; 35: 961-964
        • Morton D.L.
        • Thompson J.F.
        • Essner R.
        • et al.
        Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: a multicenter trial. Multicenter selective lymphadenectomy trial group.
        Ann Surg. 1999; 230: 452-463
        • Morton D.L.
        • Thompson J.F.
        • Cochran A.J.
        • et al.
        Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1307-1317
        • Gow K.W.
        • Rapkin L.B.
        • Olson T.A.
        • et al.
        Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the pediatric population.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2008; 43: 2193-2198
        • Wrightson W.R.
        • Wong S.L.
        • Edwards M.J.
        • et al.
        Complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10: 676-680
        • Faries M.B.
        • Thompson J.F.
        • Cochran A.
        • et al.
        The impact on morbidity and length of stay of early versus delayed complete lymphadenectomy in melanoma: results of the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 3324-3329
        • Chang S.B.
        • Askew R.L.
        • Xing Y.
        • et al.
        Prospective assessment of postoperative complications and associated costs following inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 2764-2772
        • De Vries M.
        • Hoekstra H.J.
        • Hoekstra-Weebers J.E.
        Quality of life after axillary or groin sentinel lymph node biopsy, with or without completion lymph node dissection, in patients with cutaneous melanoma.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 2840-2847
        • Delman K.A.
        • Kooby D.A.
        • Ogan K.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of a novel approach to inguinal lymphadenectomy: minimally invasive groin dissection for melanoma.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 731-737
        • Sarnaik A.A.
        • Puleo C.A.
        • Zager J.S.
        • et al.
        Limiting the morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for metastatic melanoma.
        Cancer Control. 2009; 16: 240-247
      2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Melanoma. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/melanoma.pdf.

        • Kayton M.L.
        • Delgado R.
        • Busam K.
        • et al.
        Experience with 31 sentinel lymph node biopsies for sarcomas and carcinomas in pediatric patients.
        Cancer. 2008; 112: 2052-2059
        • Balch C.M.
        • Soong S.J.
        • Gershenwald J.E.
        • et al.
        Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system.
        J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 3622-3634
        • Sahin S.
        • Rao B.
        • Kopf A.W.
        • et al.
        Predicting ten-year survival of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: corroboration of a prognostic model.
        Cancer. 1997; 80: 1426-1431
        • Haddad F.F.
        • Stall A.
        • Messina J.
        • et al.
        The progression of melanoma nodal metastasis is dependent on tumor thickness of the primary lesion.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 1999; 6: 144-149
        • Leiter U.
        • Buettner P.G.
        • Eigentler T.K.
        • et al.
        Prognosti factors of thin cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of the central malignant melanoma registry of the German Dermatological Society.
        J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 3660-3667
        • Morton D.L.
        • Wanek L.
        • Nizze J.A.
        • et al.
        Improved long-term survival after lymphadenectomy of melanoma metastatic to regional nodes. Analysis of prognostic factors in 1134 patients from the John Wayne Cancer Clinic.
        Ann Surg. 1991; 214: 491-499
        • Wong S.L.
        The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of thin melanoma.
        Am J Surg. 2005; 190: 196-199
        • Baas P.C.
        • Schraffordt K.H.
        • Hoekstra H.J.
        • et al.
        Groin dissection in the treatment of lower-extremity melanoma. Short-term and long-term morbidity.
        Arch Surg. 1992; 127: 281-286