Advertisement

Pit-picking resolves pilonidal disease in adolescents

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcome of pit-picking on adolescents with pilonidal disease.

      Methods

      Patients presenting to a Pilonidal Clinic were managed by evacuation of any un-drained collections, soaking, and as needed, hair removal. Once active inflammation resolved, they underwent pit-picking under local anesthesia. Those with >3 pits underwent sequential pit-pickings 2 months apart. Hirsute patients also underwent laser hair epilation. Pilonidal disease was stratified by severity. Patient symptoms were collected prospectively and reviewed.

      Results

      Fifty-eight patients underwent at least one pit-picking from February 2016 to September 2017. There were 40 (69%) males with a mean age of 17.7 years (range 13–24). Thirty-seven hirsute patients (64%) underwent a series of laser epilation treatments. Patients required from 0 to 3 days of non-narcotic analgesia, and all returned promptly to pre-procedure activities. Seven patients (12%) were lost to follow-up. Of the 51 patients with follow-up data, 47 (92%) were symptom-free an average of 5.0 months (range 1–20) post-procedure. Four patients (8%) had persistent intermittent drainage.

      Conclusion

      Pit-picking is a simple office procedure that may resolve pilonidal disease in many adolescents. A longer follow-up interval is needed to determine the long-term recurrence rate.

      Type of study

      Case Series.

      Level of evidence

      Level IV.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Humphries A.E.
        • Duncan J.E.
        Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease.
        Surg Clin North Am. 2010; 90: 113-124https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2009.09.006
        • Hull T.L.
        • Wu J.
        • Khanna A.
        Pilonidal disease.
        Surg Clin North Am. 2002; 82: 1169-1185
        • Notaro J.R.
        Management of recurrent pilonidal disease.
        Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 2003; 14: 173-185https://doi.org/10.1053/j.scrs.2004.03.002
        • Bascom J.
        Pilonidal disease: origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle removal as treatment.
        Surgery. 1980; 87: 567-572
        • Mccallum I.
        • Pm K.
        • Bruce J.
        • et al.
        Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus (review) healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.
        2010https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3.Copyright
        • Armstrong J.H.
        • Barcia P.J.
        Pilonidal Sinus Disease.
        Arch Surg. 1994; 129: 914https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420330028006
        • Karydakis G.E.
        Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process.
        Aust N Z J Surg. 1992; 62: 385-389
        • Guner A.
        • Boz A.
        • Ozkan O.F.
        • et al.
        Limberg flap versus Bascom cleft lift techniques for Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: prospective, randomized trial.
        World J Surg. 2013; 37: 2074-2080https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2111-9
        • Bascom J.
        • Bascom T.
        Utility of the cleft lift procedure in refractory pilonidal disease.
        Am J Surg. 2007; 193: 606-609https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.008
        • Jensen S.L.
        • Harling H.
        Prognosis after simple incision and drainage for a first-episode acute pilonidal abscess.
        Br J Surg. 1988; 75: 60-61https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800750122
        • Rushfeldt C.
        • Bernstein A.
        • Norderval S.
        • et al.
        Introducing an asymmetric cleft lift technique as a uniform procedure for pilonidal sinus surgery.
        Scand J Surg. 2008; 97: 77-81https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690809700111
        • Lord P.H.
        • Millar D.M.
        Pilonidal sinus: a simple treatment.
        Br J Surg. 1965; 52: 298-300
        • Gips M.
        • Melki Y.
        • Salem L.
        • et al.
        Minimal surgery for pilonidal disease using trephines: description of a new technique and long-term outcomes in 1,358 patients.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51: 1656-62-3https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9329-x
        • Bascom J.
        Pilonidal disease: long-term results of follicle removal.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1983; 26: 800-807
        • Di Castro A.
        • Guerra F.
        • Levi Sandri G.B.
        • et al.
        Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of pilonidal disease. The Gips procedure on 2347 patients.
        Int J Surg. 2016; 36: 201-205https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.040
        • Speter C.
        • Zmora O.
        • Nadler R.
        • et al.
        Minimal incision as a promising technique for resection of pilonidal sinus in children.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2017; 52: 1484-1487https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.040