Advertisement

Advancing pediatric medical device development via non-dilutive NIH SBIR/STTR grant funding

      Abstract

      Introduction

      A shortage of medical devices designed for children persists due to the smaller pediatric population and market factors. Furthermore, pediatric device development is challenging due to the limited available funding sources. We describe our experience with pediatric device projects that successfully received federal grant support towards commercializing the devices that can serve as a guide for future innovators.

      Methods

      The developmental pathways of pediatric device projects at a tertiary-care children's hospital that received NIH SBIR/STTR funding between 2016–2019 were reviewed. The clinical problems, designs, specific aims, and development phase were delineated.

      Results

      Pediatric faculty successfully secured NIH SBIR/STTR funding for five pediatric devices via qualified small business concerns (SBC's). Three projects were initiated in the capstone engineering design programs and developed further at two affiliated engineering schools, while the other two projects were developed in the faculty members’ labs. Four projects received funding via established SBC's, while one was awarded funding via a newly established SBC.

      Conclusion

      NIH SBIR/STTR grants are an essential source of external non-dilutive funding for pediatric device innovation and especially for academic-initiated projects. This funding can provide needed early-stage support to facilitate commercialization. In addition, these grants can serve as achievable accomplishments for pediatric faculty portfolios toward academic promotion. Our experience shows that it is possible to build a robust innovation ecosystem comprised of academic faculty (clinical/engineering) collaborating with local device development companies while jointly implementing a product development strategy leveraging NIH SBIR/STTR funding for critical translational research phases of pediatric device development.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration), NIH (National Institutes of Health), SBC (Small business concern), SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research grants (R43 / R44 grants)), STTR (Small Business Technology Transfer grants (R41 / R42 grants))
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Peiris V.
        • Xu K.
        • Agler H.L.
        • et al.
        Children and adults with rare diseases need innovative medical Devices.
        J Med Devices. 2018; 12https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040489
        • The National Institutes of Health (NIH)
        The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (HHS).
        The National Institutes Of Health (NIH) and THE Centers For Disease Control And Prevention (CDC) Small Businessinnovation Research (SBIR) program, program solicitation PHS. 2020; (-1)
        • Surgery S on C and C, Orthopaedics SO
        Off-label use of medical devices in children.
        Pediatrics. 2017; 139https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3439
        • Hwang T.J.
        • Kesselheim A.S.
        • Bourgeois F.T.
        Postmarketing trials and pediatric device approvals.
        Pediatrics. 2014; 133: e1197-e1202https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3348
        • SECTION ON SURGERY, COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS, AMERICAN PEDIATRIC SURGICAL ASSOCIATION NEW TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE
        Responsible innovation in children's surgical care.
        pediatrics. 2017; 139https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3437
        • Sack B.S.
        • Elizondo R.A.
        • Huang G.O.
        • et al.
        Pediatric medical device development by surgeons via capstone engineering design programs.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53: 493-498https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.01.067
        • Ulrich L.C.
        • Joseph F.D.
        • Lewis D.Y.
        • Koenig R.L.
        FDA's Pediatric device consortia: national program fosters pediatric medical device development.
        Pediatrics. 2013; 131: 981-985https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1534
        • Grant M.
        • Stanasel I.
        • Koh C.J.
        Pediatric medical device consortia: a novel pathway for pediatric device development for pediatric urologists and other pediatric specialists.
        Urol Pract. 2015; 2: 206-210https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urpr.2014.11.002