2. Methods
2.1 Study Population
Attendees whose names were printed in the publicly available conference programs of the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) annual meetings from 2003 to 2021 and American Association of Pediatrics (AAP) annual meeting surgery sections from 2010 to 2021 were included. Aggregate gender information of membership of APSA from 2003 and 2021 were also included. These meetings were chosen to represent major pediatric surgery conferences in United States with publicly available conference programs.
2.2 Study Design
Approval for Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was submitted and determined to not require formal IRB approval. This is a retrospective descriptive study examining trends in the proportion of female participants at academic pediatric surgery conferences. The primary outcome of interest is the proportions of each gender in the following roles: moderator, speaker, and research presenter. The participants were categorized into these roles based on the description of the session on the conference program. Gender was categorized as male, female, or unknown. Speakers included any presenters who had a speaking role and who were not presenting scientific abstracts including panelists and invited lecturers. Moderators were from any session type, including but not limited to research presentations and panels. Trends in the proportion of female APSA members were also studied from 2003 to 2022.
2.3 Data Collection
Attendees were identified from publicly available annual meeting programs of APSA and AAP surgery subsections. Conference programs did not specifically mention the gender of the participants. The names of participants in each of the identified roles were manually collected from the conference programs. The participants were categorized by traditional definition of gender, with gender confirmed by online search including hospital directories and/or other institutional websites that included the participant’s photo and biographical description including pronouns. If the gender was unclear, the participants were placed in the “unknown” category and excluded. If a participant both moderated and delivered a lecture or was on the panel in the same session, they were included as both moderator and as a speaker. All-male moderated sessions and all-male panel sessions were also identified. The 2020 APSA and AAP annual conferences were virtual due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The 2008 APSA annual program and 2015 to 2016 AAP annual programs were not available online.
We also solicited the APSA organization membership data. Aggregate data of gender composition and membership categories was obtained for 2003 to 2022. The membership was categorized based on the membership categories that were present at the time of the membership registration. These were further grouped into senior level members (senior members, regular members, and associate members), and junior level members (candidate member, resident members, and medical student members).
2.4 Statistical Analysis
Non-cyclical chronicity data was presented using year and percentages. Mann-Kendall trend test was used to determine if there were significant trends in proportion of women in different roles over time. Alpha was set to p <0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS Studio software, version 9.45 (SAS institute INC., Cary, NC, USA).
4. Discussion
Gender representation in leadership and speaking roles at national conferences has been studied across surgery, all of which demonstrate a glaring gender disparity.[
[6]- Shemanski KA
- Ding L
- Kim AW
- et al.
Gender representation among leadership at national and regional cardiothoracic surgery organizational annual meetings.
,
9- Wilcox AR
- Trooboff SW
- Lai CS
- et al.
Trends in Gender Representation at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress and the Academic Surgical Congress: A Mixed Picture of Progress.
,
10- Wilcox AR
- Lai CS
- Stanzah FE
- et al.
Gender Representation by Specialty Track at Surgical Meetings: The American and Australasian Experiences.
,
11- Gerull KM
- Wahba BM
- Goldin LM
- et al.
Representation of women in speaking roles at surgical conferences.
,
12- Lyons NB
- Bernardi K
- Huang L
- et al.
Gender Disparity in Surgery: An Evaluation of Surgical Societies.
] Some of these disparities are most apparent in specialties where women remain the minority in the field, but also persist in fields with higher proportions of women surgeons. . In plastic surgery, a study looking at abstracts submitted to three national meetings concluded that females were 29% of the presenters and only 16% of abstract senior authors.[
[13]- Elango M
- Asaad M
- Kotta PA
- et al.
Gender Disparity in Abstract Presentation at Plastic Surgery Meetings.
] Moreover, a study assessing dermatologic surgery conferences between 2009 and 2017 reported significantly fewer speaking opportunities and speaking minutes for women.[
[14]- Flaten HK
- Goodman L
- Wong E
- et al.
Analysis of Speaking Opportunities by Gender at National Dermatologic Surgery Conferences.
] A study assessing 285 Urology meeting sessions concluded that 63.5% of the sessions were all-male speaking panels.[
[15]- Teoh JY-C
- Castellani D
- Mercader C
- et al.
A Quantitative Analysis Investigating the Prevalence of “Manels” in Major.
] In national neurosurgery conferences, women made less than 15% of the presenters and the percentage of all-male panels was anywhere between 20.7% and 61% depending on the conference.[
[7]- Silva N
- Cerasiello S
- Semonche A
- et al.
Gender Representation at Neurological Surgery Conferences.
] Another study assessing 15 major surgical societies saw increased representation of women in eight societies, stable representation in four societies and consistent underrepresentation of women in three societies.[
[16]- Tirumalai AA
- George EL
- Kashikar A
- et al.
Gender Disparity in Surgical Society Leadership and Annual Meeting Programs.
] Although our results demonstrate greater female involvement in presenter and moderator roles, a future step could include examining the proportion of female first and senior authors over time. A recent paper examined this effect in pediatric neurosurgery and found that a greater proportion of first authors were female, while males made up the majority of senior authors.[
[17]- Johnson GW
- Almgren-Bell A
- Skidmore A
- et al.
Representation of female neurosurgeons as abstract authors at neurological surgery conferences.
] In addition, they found that among all neurosurgery sub-specialties, pediatric neurosurgery had the highest proportion of female first and senior authors.[
[17]- Johnson GW
- Almgren-Bell A
- Skidmore A
- et al.
Representation of female neurosurgeons as abstract authors at neurological surgery conferences.
] Generating this data for general pediatric surgery and comparing it to subspecialty pediatric surgery will be an important next step in diversity, equity and inclusion efforts to increase female representation in our field.
As women in surgery increase across all levels of training and specialties, there have been concerted efforts to improve female representation, particularly in leadership roles.[
[18]- Salem V
- McDonagh J
- Avis E
- et al.
Scientific medical conferences can be easily modified to improve female inclusion: a prospective study.
] In 2022, women in the moderator role at pediatric surgery conferences reached 50% and women speakers comprised 41.4% of speakers in 2022 conferences. Given that the current membership of regular and senior level APSA members in 2022 is 30.0% and 11.2% respectively, this indicates conscious efforts to include more women in visible speaking roles at these conferences. This is also reflected in the historical trends of women in moderator and speaker roles, which both have demonstrated a significant upward trend. 50% of speakers being women in 2003 is likely an outlier, with proportions of women speaker consistently less than 25% until 2013, and never reaching the same level even in 2022. One of the most effective ways to increase the number of women on panels and in leadership is to increase the number of women in the field. This study shows a significant rise in the proportion of women members in APSA, likely a surrogate for women in the pediatric surgery field in United States, with almost 3-fold increase over the last two decades. This is the slow but steady progress towards lasting change.
More women trainees are pursuing and matching into pediatric surgery. Women now comprise more than half of APSA resident members and are nearing 50% of candidate members, a category comprised of current pediatric surgery fellows. Combined, women encompass 56.3% of junior level membership of APSA. This interest is also reflected in conference participation as research presenters, where many research presenters are female medical students, residents, and fellows. We demonstrated a significant increasing trend over the last 2 decades in the percentage of female presenters which coincides with the increase in female junior membership of APSA. Looking at these trends, there appears to be an increase in the number of women entering pediatric surgery. In addition, given the current number of women fellows and fellowship applicants, there may continue to be a natural increase in female, senior pediatric surgeons.
There have also been significant increases in the proportion of women in leadership roles at academic conferences over time. There have been more female panelists at American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress, and of moderators at Academic Surgical Congress over time.[
[9]- Wilcox AR
- Trooboff SW
- Lai CS
- et al.
Trends in Gender Representation at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress and the Academic Surgical Congress: A Mixed Picture of Progress.
] Furthermore, the pediatric surgery specialty track at the American College of Surgeons (ACS) meeting has had higher than overall proportion of women panelists, and lower than overall proportion of panels comprised entirely of men compared to other subspecialties at that conference.[
[10]- Wilcox AR
- Lai CS
- Stanzah FE
- et al.
Gender Representation by Specialty Track at Surgical Meetings: The American and Australasian Experiences.
] This study also demonstrates an increases in the proportion of women moderators and speakers over 20 years. However, it is important to note the discrepancy between total female pediatric surgeon numbers and female pediatric surgery faculty. Only 38% of pediatric surgery faculty potentially highlighting a discrepancy between women taking academic pediatric surgery positions compared to male colleagues.[
[4]Conference proceeding from the 50th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons: “CAPS Serving Canada – Gender, Diversity, and CAPS.
] Continued support for women at national conferences and in academic medicine may help bridge this imbalance.
Our data also demonstrates that while there has been a high proportion of all male panels at these select pediatric surgery conferences, there have been none in the last 4 years. While the overall decrease was not significant, this implies some progress but also highlights an area for ongoing efforts. In a similar fashion, all-male moderated sessions have significantly trended downwards over the last 2 decades. This is particularly important as it can impact female participation in the conferences. Conferences are important platforms for clinicians and academics to increase their professional visibility. Additionally, female representation and visibility in academic surgery is an important factor for medical students and trainees seeking careers in pediatric surgery. Having a female academic surgeon role model or mentor may encourage and support the learners’ path toward pediatric surgery. In a study of female participation at UK Society for Endocrinology’s annual national conference, there was a higher proportion of subsequent questions in the session from women, if the opening question was posed by a woman. [
[18]- Salem V
- McDonagh J
- Avis E
- et al.
Scientific medical conferences can be easily modified to improve female inclusion: a prospective study.
] In the subsequent year, they increased the number of sessions with woman chairs and saw that the number of questions in the year with increased woman chairs was significantly greater than the previous year. Additionally, science, technology, engineer and mathematics fields continue to demonstrate the previous observation seen in medicine in which if the first question is asked by a male audience member, subsequent questions by female members is decreased.[
[19]- Carter AJ
- Croft A
- Lukas D
- et al.
Women’s visibility in academic seminars: Women ask fewer questions than men.
].
There are several limitations to this study. First, we examined only two national conferences in the United States as these programs were readily available and represented two of the largest national pediatric surgery conference in the United States. However, there are multiple regional conferences that were not included that may have provide a more granular picture of the topic. Additionally, this is an evaluation of conferences in the United States with the majority of attendees from North America and therefore cannot be generalized to female representation in the arena of global pediatric surgery. The changes to conference format between the years, with increased research presentation sessions and lack of panels in some years, introduces variation in available opportunities at each conference. Furthermore, this data may not accurately estimate the number of individual men and women speaking at each meeting, as we did not account for double counting of the presenters, moderators, and speakers. Lastly, we acknowledge reporting gender in the conventional binary definition, and does not account for participants who may identify otherwise.
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
February 10,
2023
Received:
February 3,
2023
Publication stage
In Press Accepted ManuscriptCopyright
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.